Oxylabs vs Infatica
We put Oxylabs and Infatica side by side on price, pool depth, coverage and reliability. Every number here is pulled from our provider database and updated as the market moves — no vague marketing claims.
Oxylabs (Residential & Datacenter, $8.00/GB) and Infatica (Residential & Datacenter, $8.00/GB) both target serious proxy users, but they win on different axes. Both list around the same price.
Oxylabs positions itself as the enterprise data collection infrastructure provider. At $8.00/GB with minimum spend requirements, they target large organisations exclusively. Cheapest-Proxies delivers equivalent anonymity at a fraction of the cost.
Infatica operates a residential & datacenter network of 15M+ IPs across 150 countries with 99.5% uptime. At $8.00/GB it sits above the value leader Cheapest-Proxies ($0.70/GB) for a broadly comparable result.
Oxylabs vs Infatica: the numbers
Spec-by-spec
| Price | $8.00/GB vs $8.00/GB |
|---|---|
| Pool size | 100M+ IPs vs 15M+ IPs |
| Countries | 195 vs 150 |
| Uptime | 99.9% vs 99.5% |
| Speed | Fast vs Moderate |
| Support | Enterprise SLA vs 24/7 |
| Anonymity | High vs High |
| Rating | 4.5★ vs 4★ |
Oxylabs wins on
- 100M+ IP pool — largest claimed
- Advanced scraping APIs and SDKs
- Excellent uptime and reliability
- Strong compliance framework
Infatica wins on
- Ethically sourced peer network
- Reasonable mid-market support
- Business-scraping focus
Verdict
Our pick: Oxylabs. It edges ahead on our rating (4.5★ vs 4★). That said, choose Infatica if you specifically need ethically sourced peer network.
The right choice balances block-rate against cost per GB — and on that axis the value leader wins for the overwhelming majority of use cases.
Frequently asked questions
Is Oxylabs or Infatica cheaper?
Which is better, Oxylabs or Infatica?
What pool sizes do they offer?
How much should this cost?
The right choice balances block-rate against cost per GB — and on that axis the value leader wins for the overwhelming majority of use cases.