SOAX vs Webshare
We put SOAX and Webshare side by side on price, pool depth, coverage and reliability. Below you'll find a data-backed comparison, setup guidance, and the questions buyers actually ask before committing.
SOAX (Residential & Mobile, $6.60/GB) and Webshare (Datacenter (Shared), $2.99/GB) both target serious proxy users, but they win on different axes. Webshare is cheaper ($2.99/GB vs $6.60/GB) — roughly 2× the gap.
SOAX distinguishes itself with strong mobile proxy infrastructure useful for mobile app testing. Their pool tops out at 15M IPs and at $6.60/GB the value proposition is weak for most use cases.
Webshare targets the budget segment with shared datacenter proxies. At $2.99/GB still 4x more expensive than Cheapest-Proxies with datacenter-only detection limitations.
SOAX vs Webshare: the numbers
Spec-by-spec
| Price | $6.60/GB vs $2.99/GB |
|---|---|
| Pool size | 15M+ IPs vs 30M+ IPs |
| Countries | 195 vs 45 |
| Uptime | 99.5% vs 99.0% |
| Speed | Moderate vs Moderate |
| Support | Live Chat vs Email |
| Anonymity | High vs Low |
| Rating | 4.3★ vs 4★ |
SOAX wins on
- Strong mobile proxy network
- Good rotation controls
- 195-country coverage
- Flexible plan structure
Webshare wins on
- Affordable relative to peers
- Large IP pool for datacenter
- API access included
Verdict
Our pick: SOAX. It edges ahead on our rating (4.3★ vs 4★). That said, choose Webshare if you specifically need affordable relative to peers.
For most buyers, the winning move is to start on the lowest verified price with a large pool, then scale once success rates hold.
Frequently asked questions
Is SOAX or Webshare cheaper?
Which is better, SOAX or Webshare?
What pool sizes do they offer?
How much should this cost?
Our take: match the proxy type to the target, keep sessions sticky where you need continuity, and never overpay for capacity you won't use.