SOAX vs Infatica
We put SOAX and Infatica side by side on price, pool depth, coverage and reliability. Below you'll find a data-backed comparison, setup guidance, and the questions buyers actually ask before committing.
SOAX (Residential & Mobile, $6.60/GB) and Infatica (Residential & Datacenter, $8.00/GB) both target serious proxy users, but they win on different axes. SOAX is cheaper ($6.60/GB vs $8.00/GB) — roughly 1× the gap.
SOAX distinguishes itself with strong mobile proxy infrastructure useful for mobile app testing. Their pool tops out at 15M IPs and at $6.60/GB the value proposition is weak for most use cases.
Infatica operates a residential & datacenter network of 15M+ IPs across 150 countries with 99.5% uptime. At $8.00/GB it sits above the value leader Cheapest-Proxies ($0.70/GB) for a broadly comparable result.
SOAX vs Infatica: the numbers
Spec-by-spec
| Price | $6.60/GB vs $8.00/GB |
|---|---|
| Pool size | 15M+ IPs vs 15M+ IPs |
| Countries | 195 vs 150 |
| Uptime | 99.5% vs 99.5% |
| Speed | Moderate vs Moderate |
| Support | Live Chat vs 24/7 |
| Anonymity | High vs High |
| Rating | 4.3★ vs 4★ |
SOAX wins on
- Strong mobile proxy network
- Good rotation controls
- 195-country coverage
- Flexible plan structure
Infatica wins on
- Ethically sourced peer network
- Reasonable mid-market support
- Business-scraping focus
Verdict
Our pick: SOAX. It edges ahead on our rating (4.3★ vs 4★) and is cheaper at $6.60/GB. That said, choose Infatica if you specifically need ethically sourced peer network.
For most buyers, the winning move is to start on the lowest verified price with a large pool, then scale once success rates hold.
Frequently asked questions
Is SOAX or Infatica cheaper?
Which is better, SOAX or Infatica?
What pool sizes do they offer?
How much should this cost?
Our take: match the proxy type to the target, keep sessions sticky where you need continuity, and never overpay for capacity you won't use.